Prospective platform for the improvement of the competitiveness of the Colombian shipyard sector through the development of integrated logistical capabilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25043/19098642.169Keywords:
logistical capabilities, competitiveness, clusterAbstract
The Colombian shipyard sector is characterized by peculiarities that make it differ from other sectors that define its framework of operation, such as technical, technological, economic and institutional aspects and the dynamics of the shipyard market: a global competitive market; few local actors; difficulties to compete at the international level; financial, economic, technological and information asymmetries through its supply chain. Through the development of integrated logistic capacities, as a mechanism for the articulation and promotion of regional clusters, it is possible to improve the competitiveness of the shipyard sector, from the articulation of logistic operations, to achieve competitive advantages that are sustainable over time and leverage the articulation potential of the public, private and academic actors that make up and participate in the sector. Integrated logistics capabilities represent how organizations can leverage their resources in conjunction with other members of their supply chain and the industry in general, to deploy organizational strategies and achieve joint benefits for members. In this research, a prospective and strategic platform is presented to promote the creation of the Colombian shipyard cluster through the development of integrated logistic capacities, based on the utilization of the strategic resources of the sector's stakeholders and the analysis of the potentialities for their integration and development from the perspective of the theory of organizational resources in the context of supply chain management.
Downloads
References
ADARME JAIMES, W., ARANGO SERNA, M. D. & BALCÁZAR, D. A. (2011). Model for the coordination of agents in a logistical system of the Colombian shipbuilding industry. Engineering and Research, 31(2), 102–111.
ADARME JAIMES, W., ARANGO SERNA, M. D., & BALCAZAR CAMACHO, D. A. (2011). Supply chain coordination model with autonomous agents in a decentralized environment. In International Supply Chain Management and Collaboration Practices (pp. 315–328).
BALCAZAR, D. A. (2014). Methodology for coordinating actors in the drug supply chain of the institutions providing health services in the oncology sector. Universidad District Francisco José de Caldas.
BALCÁZAR CAMACHO, D. A., LÓPEZ BELLO, C. A., & ADARME JAIMES, W. (2016). Strategic guidelines for supply chain coordination in healthcare and a mathematical model as a proposed mechanism for the measurement of coordination effects. Dyna, 83(197), 203. http://doi.org/10.15446/dyna. v83n197.55596
BARNEY, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. http://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
BEAMON, B. (1999). Measuring supply chain performance.InternationalJournalofOperations & Production Management, 19, 275–292. http://doi.org/10.1108/01443579910249714
BENITO, G. R. G., BERGER, E., DE LA FOREST, M., & SHUM, J. (2003). A cluster analysis of the maritime sector in Norway. International Journal of Transport Management, 1(4), 203 –215. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtm.2003.12.001
CAIAZZA, R., RICHARDSON, A., & AUDRETSCH, D. (2015). Knowledge effects on competitiveness: from firms to regional advantage. Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(6), 899–909. http://doi.org/10.1007/ s10961-015-9425-8
CASTELLANOS, O. F., RAMÍREZ, D. C., FÚQUENE, A. M., QUINTERO, R., & FONSECA, S. L. (2013). Competitiveness appropriation and mechanisms for strengthening. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional of Colombia.
ESPER, T. L., FUGATE, B. S., & DAVIS- SRAMEK, B. (2007). Logistics Learning Capability: Sustaining the Competitive Advantage Gained Through Logistics Leverage -. Journal of Business Logistics: JBL, 28(2).
FROHLICH, M. T., & WESTBROOK, R. (2001). Arcs of integration: An international study of supply chain strategies. Journal of Operations Management, 19, 185–200. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00055-3
GLIGOR, D. M., & HOLCOMB, M. C. (2012). Understanding the role of logistics capabilities in achieving supply chain agility: A systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management, 17(4), 438 – 453. http://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211246594
GLIGOR, D. M., & HOLCOMB, M. C. (2014). Antecedents and consequences of integrating logistics capabilities across the supply chain. Transportation Journal, 53(2), 211–234. http://doi.org/10.1353/tnp.2014.0014
GRAFTON, J., LILLIS, A. M., & WIDENER, S. K. (2010). The role of performance measurement and evaluation in building organizational capabilities and performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(7), 689–706. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2010.07.004
GRANT, R. M. (1996). Prospering in Dynamically-competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration. Organization Science, 7(4), 13. http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.4.375
GRONAU, N., & KERN, E.-M. (2004). Collaborative Engineering Communities in Shipbuilding. In Virtual Enterprises and Collaborative Networks (pp. 329–338). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. http://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-8139-1_35
GUNASEKARAN, A., & KOBU, B. (2007). Performance measures and metrics in logistics and supply chain management: A review of recent literature (1995-2004) for research and applications. International Journal of Production Research, 45(12), 2819–2840. http://doi.org/10.1080/00207540600806513
LECHNER, C., & DOWLING, M. (2003). Firm Networks: External Relationships as Sources for the Growth and Competitiveness of Entrepreneurial Firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 15(1), 1–26. http://doi.org/10.1080/08985620210159220
LYNCH, D. F., KELLER, S. B., & OZMENT, J. (2000). The Effects of Logistics Capabilities and Strategy on Firm Performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 21(2), 47–67.
MENTZER, J. T., MIN, S., & BOBBITT, L. M. (2004). Toward a unified theory of logistics. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 34(8), 606–627. http://doi.org/10.1108/09600030410557758
MORASH, E. A., DRÖGE, C. L. M., & VICKERY, S. K. (1996). Strategic Logistics Capabilities for Competitive Advantage and Firm Success. Journal of Business Logistics: JBL, 17(1).
OECD. (2015). Shipbuilding and the offshore industry, 6, 1–21.
OTERO, M. A. (2012). Design of a proposal for the management of supply and inventories for a shipyard in Colombia. Universidad Nacional of Colombia.
PAINE, A. N. O. ., RANSING, R. S. ., GETHIN, D. T. ., SIMS, G. J. ., RICHLEY, J. M. ., BOISSEVAIN, L. J. ., & LEWIS, M. W. . (2013). Challenges faced by a small ship yard in integrating computer aided design and production processes - A real life case study. RINA, Royal Institution of Naval Architects - International Conference on Computer Applications in Shipbuilding 2013, ICCAS 2013, 3, 107–114. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0- 84903637677&partnerID=40&md5=83c864 f42404e11ed648114af93b23e5
PFOHL, H.-C., & BUSE, H. P. (2000). Inter-organizational logistics systems in flexible production networks: An organizational capabilities perspective. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 30 (5), 388 – 408. http://doi.org/10.1108/09600030010336153
RAI, A., PATNAYAKUNI, R., & SETH, N. (2006). Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 30(2), 225–246. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2- s2.0-32044456370&partnerID=40&md5=4c71168117a807b40755d77069106160
RALSTON, P. M., GRAWE, S. J., & DAUGHERTY, P. J. (2013). Logistics salience impact on logistics capabilities and performance. International Journal of Logistics Management, The, 24(September), 136–152. http://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-10-2012-0113
RUNGTUSANATHAM, M., SALVADOR, F., FORZA, C., & CHOI, T. Y. (2003). Supply- chain linkages and operational performance: A resource-based-view perspective. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 23(9), 1084–1099. http://doi.org/10.1108/01443570310491783
RUUSKA, I., AHOLA, T., MARTINSUO, M., & WESTERHOLM, T. (2013). Supplier capabilities in large shipbuilding projects. International Journal of Project Management, 31(4), 542–553. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.09.017
SHANG, K. C., & MARLOW, P. B. (2005). Logistics capability and performance in Taiwan’s major manufacturing firms. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 41, 217–234. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2004.03.002
UNCTAD. (2016). Review of Maritime Transport 2016. Geneva.
VISHNEVSKIY,K.,KARASEV,O.,MEISSNER, D., RAZHEVA, A., & KLUBOVA, M. (2015). Technology foresight in asset intensive industries: The case of Russian shipbuilding. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 1–11. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.05.001
ZACHARIA, Z. G., NIX, N. W., & LUSCH, R. F. (2011). Capabilities that enhance outcomes of an episodic supply chain collaboration. Journal of Operations Management, 29(6), 591–603. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2011.02.001
ZHAO, M., DRÖGE, C., & STANK, T. P. (2001). The effects of logistics capabilities on firm performance: customer-focused versus information-focused capabilities. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), 91–107. http://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2001.tb00005.x

Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in this Journal certify that:
- The work submitted for publication in The Ship Science and Technology journal, was written by the author, given that its content is the product of his/her direct intellectual contribution.
- All data and references to material already published are duly identified with their respective credits and are included in the bibliographic notes and quotations highlighted as such.
- All materials submitted for publication are completely free of copyrights; consequently, the author accepts responsibility for any lawsuit or claim related with Intellectual Property Rights thereof, Exonerating of responsibility to The Science and Technology for the Development of Naval, Maritime, and Riverine Industry Corporation, COTECMAR.
- In the event that the article is chosen for publication by The Ship Science and Technology journal, the author state that he/she totally transfers reproduction rights of such to The Science and Technology for the Development of Naval, Maritime, and Riverine Industry Corporation, COTECMAR.
- The authors retain the copyright and transfer to COTECMAR the right of publication and reproduction of the work which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC -BY) , which allows the license to copy, distribute, display and represent the work and to make derivative works as long as it recognizes and cites the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
- For more information about the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC -BY) and his use and scope, please visit the following web page https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode