Decision-making model for propulsion system selection

Authors

  • Daniel Álverez Berdugo Navy Republic of Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia
  • Miguel A. Romero Navy Republic of Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia
  • Juan E. Cruz Navy Republic of Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25043/19098642.249

Keywords:

Maritime pollution, Greenhouse gases, Cost Effectiveness, Energy Saving, Propulsion System

Abstract

History it has become evident that the military industry and its thriving action has generated change and development in different areas, and it is to be expected that a project as ambitious as the Strategic Surface Platform - PES focuses on the impact that internal combustion systems can generate in the design, therefore an evaluation model is developed for the selection of the propulsion system of the platform, which was based on the life cycle cost and performance of the main mechanical equipment, providing an additional tool for decision making. The cost side was estimated by breaking down the ROM (Rough Order of Magnitude) acquisition costs, maintenance costs and fuel and lubricant consumption costs, which leaves the performance side evaluated under the technical characteristics, considering the criteria of performance, reliability, delivered power and installation footprint; without leaving aside the mandatory requirements such as IMO TIER III gas emissions, reduction of the acoustic signature and the use of redundancy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Daniel Álverez Berdugo, Navy Republic of Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia

Technical Section PES Program - Navy Republic of Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia.

Miguel A. Romero, Navy Republic of Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia

Technical Section PES Program - Navy Republic of Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia.

Juan E. Cruz, Navy Republic of Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia

Technical Section PES Program - Navy Republic of Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia.

References

AAKKO-SAKSA, P. T., LEHTORANTA, K., KUITTINEN, N., JÄRVINEN, A., JALKANEN, J. P., JOHNSON, K., JUNG, H., NTZIACHRISTOS, L., GAGNÉ, S., TAKAHASHI, C., KARJALAINEN, P., RÖNKKÖ, T., & TIMONEN, H. (2023). Reduction in greenhouse gas and other emissions from ship engines: Current trends and future options. In Progress in Energy and Combustion Science (Vol. 94). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2022.101055.

AMMAR, N. R., & SEDDIEK, I. S. (2021). Evaluation of the environmental and economic impacts of electric propulsion systems onboard ships: case study passenger vessel. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(28), 37851-37866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13271-4

BARLAS, B., & AZMI OZSOYSAL, O. (2001). The diesel-electric hybrid propulsion systems for Turskish frigates. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266204021

CAPUTO, R. J. (2010). Impacts of Reducing Shipboard NOx and SOx Emissions on Vessel Performance. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

GEERTSMA, R., NEGENBORN, R. R., VISSER, K., & HOPMAN, J. J. (2017). Design and control of hybrid power and propulsion systems for smart ships: A review of developments. In Applied Energy (Vol.194, pp. 30-54). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.060

GEERTSMA, R., VOLLBRANDT, J., NEGENBORN, R., VISSER, K., & HOPMAN, H. (2017). A quantitative comparison of hybrid diesel-electricand gas turbine-electric propulsion for future frigates. Defence Materiel Organisation, 451-458. https://doi.org/10.1109/ESTS.2017.8069321

HOLTROP, J., & MENNEN, G. G. (1977). An approximate power prediction method. 166-170. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISP-1982-2933501

LINDSTAD, H. E., & SANDAAS, I. (2016). Emission and fuel reduction for offshore support vessels through hybrid technology. Journal of Ship Production and Design, 32(4), 195-205. https://doi.org/10.5957/JSPD.32.4.150006

MORALES E., O., SILVA, A., ZÁRATE, F., & ARMADA DE COLOMBIA (2016a). Technical Concept Evaluation of configurations for the ESP propulsion system.

MORALES E., O., SILVA, A., ZÁRATE, F., & ARMADA DE COLOMBIA (2016b). Report Development of evaluation model for selection of the propulsion system of the Strategic Surface Platform - PES.

OHMAYER, H. F. (2012). Propulsion System Choices for modern Naval Vessels.

Royal Navy U.K. (n.d.). DUKE CLASS TYPE 23 FRIGATE. Retrieved January 22, 2023, from https://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/theequipment/ships/frigates/duke-class

SILATAN, S., EDALAT, P., & RAHIMI, M. (2014). Hybrid Propulsion System For New Generation Of Ships. www.SID.ir

ZHU, J., CHEN, L., WANG, B., & XIA, L. (2018). Optimal design of a hybrid electric propulsive system for an anchor handling tug supply vessel. Applied Energy, 226, 423-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.131.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-31

How to Cite

Álverez Berdugo, D., Romero, M. A., & Cruz, J. E. (2024). Decision-making model for propulsion system selection. Ciencia Y tecnología De Buques, 17(34), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.25043/19098642.249

Issue

Section

Scientific and Technological Research Articles
QR Code

Some similar items: