New technological surveillance and benchmarking theories and tools applied to sustainable and strategic planning of the naval industry

Authors

  • Esther Álvarez Fundación In-Nova Castilla La Mancha. Toledo, España.
  • Luis Enrique Sánchez Sicaman Nuevas Tecnologías. Tomelloso, España.
  • Santiago Molins Iscam Desarrollos. Madrid, España.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25043/19098642.61

Keywords:

technological surveillance, benchmarking, neural networks, internet, strategic planning, technological indicators, market intelligence, trackers, indexers, feeders, decision structures, search engines, semantic web

Abstract

Since their beginning, companies establish procedures to observe their competitors. Methods for obtaining this kind of information have evolved with the internet era; a plethora of tools is nowadays available for this job. As a consequence, a new problem has emerged: documentary noise, keeping companies from being able to process and benefit from the huge amount of information gathered. Strategic planning mainly relies on obtaining environmental knowledge, so companies need help on dealing with this documentary noise; technological surveillance and benchmarking are preferred methodologies to achieve this objective, coping with data produced by automatic internet tools like search engines and others. Qualified results of better nature are produced by bringing new theories on information gathering and processing intoboth tools. This article exposes empirical results on the application of a demonstrative technological surveillance system based on different R&D management structures, relying on benchmarking indicators for the naval and aeronautics industries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

CHEN, D., G. DOUMEINGTS, AND F. VERNADAT, Architectures for enterprise integration and interoperability: Past, present and future. Computers in Industry, 2008. 59(7): p. 647-659.

DUARTE, F., Vigilância Tecnológica, in Associação das industrias navais, C.d.e.e.p.e.d.d.I.D.i.n.s. naval, Editor. 2010.

KLINE, S. AND N. ROSENBERG, "An overview of innovation", in "The Positive Sum Strategy". 1986, National Academy Press: Washington.

TENA MILLÁN, J. AND A. COMAI, Inteligencia Competitiva en Empresas Industriales y de Servicio. Experiencia de Implantación en España y Latinoamerica., ed. E.E.y.P.-R.H.d.l.I. Competitiva. 2006.

LEE, S.-S., et al., Development of internet-based ship technical information management system. Ocean Engineering, 2006. 33(13): p. 1814- 1828.

KAPLAN, R.S. AND D.P. NORTON, "Having trouble with your strategy? Then map it". Harvard Business Review, 2000(September- October).

SNOW, C., C. OLSON, AND T. MELCER, Navy Medical Technology Watch: Hemostatic Dressing Products for the Battlefield, N.H.R. Center, Editor. 2009: San Diego, California 92186-5122.

BEN ABDELAZIZ, F. AND H. EL-BAZ. "An optimization model based on Neural Network and Particle Swarm: an application case from de UAE". in International Conference on Engineering Systems Management and its Applications (ICESMA). 2010. Sharjah: IEEE.

RAHARJO, H., et al., "Dynamic Benchmarking Methodology for Quality Function Deployment". in International Conference on Inustrial Engeneering and Enginneering Management (IEEM). 2008. Singapore: IEEE.

First Marine International, L., First Marine International Findings for the Global Shipbuilding Industrial Base benchmarking Study. 2005: London.

BROOK, D.A., et al., Benchmarking Best Practices in Transformation for Sea Enterprise. 2006, Center for Defense Management Reform.

KRAFT, J., "The Department of the Navy Benchmarking Handbook: A Systems View". 1997, Department of the Navy.

SOREN, A., et al., Triplify: light-weight linked data publication from relational databases, in Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web. 2009, ACM: Madrid, Spain.

TIM FININ, et al., Swoogle: Searching for knowledge on the Semantic Web. American Association for Artificial Intelligence (www. aaai.org), 2005.

GAYO, D. Semantic Browsing of a Domain Specific Resources: The Corese-NeLI Framework. 2008.

CORBY, O., et al., Ontology-based Approximate Query Processing for Searching the Semantic Web with Corese. Rapport de recherche n° 5621, 2005. July, 2005.

OLIVIER, C., Searching the Semantic Web: Approximate Query Processing Based on Ontologies, D.-K. Rose, F.-Z. Catherine, and G. Fabien, Editors. 2006. p. 20-27.

XIAOGUANG, Q. AND D.D. BRIAN, Web page classification: Features and algorithms. ACM Comput. Surv., 2009. 41(2): p. 1-31.

MARCO, A. AND L. BIAGIO, A web search methodology for different user typologies, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies and Workshop for PhD Students in Computing. 2009, ACM: Ruse, Bulgaria.

WEINBERGER, H., J. FILIPE, AND J. CORDEIRO, Search in Context Enterprise Information Systems, W. Aalst, et al., Editors. 2011, Springer Berlin Heidelberg. p. 587-599.

BUSSLER, C., Is Semantic Web Technology Taking the Wrong Turn? Internet Computing, IEEE, 2008. 12(1): p. 75-79.

VANESSA, L., et al., Cross ontology query answering on the semantic web: an initial evaluation, in Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Knowledge capture. 2009, ACM: Redondo Beach, California, USA.

ANSI/NISO, Information Retrieval (Z39.50): Application Service Definition and Protocol Specification. 2003, International Standard Maintenance Agency.

SRU/SRW, SRU/SRW (Search and Retrieve URL/Web Service).

Matheo Analyzer: Database Analysis, Information Mapping.

VILLALON, J. AND R.A. CALVO. "Concept Extraction from student essays, towards Concept Map Mining". in IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies 2009: IEEE Computer Society Washington, DC, USA.

ESCORSA CASTELLS, P. AND J. VALLS PASOLA, "Tecnología e Innovación en la Empresa". 2005, Barcelona: Alfaomega - Edicions UPC.

ROTHWELL, R., "Towards the fifthgeneration innovation process". International Marketing Review, 1994. 11(1).

ROSSEGER, G., "The Economics of Production and Innovation". 1980, Oxford: Pergamon Press.

MYERS, S. AND D.G. MARQUIS, "Succesful Industrial Innovations: A Study of Factors Underlying Innovation in Selected Firms". 1969, National Science Foundation: Washington.

VON HIPPEL, E., "The sources of Innovation". 1998: Oxford University Press.

GRUBER, W. AND D. MARQUIS, "Factors in the transfer of Technology". 1969, Cambridge: MIT Press.

MYERS, S. AND D. MARQUIS, "Successful Commercial Innovations". 1969, Washington: National Science Foundation.

MARQUIS, D., "The Anatomy of Successful Innovations". Innovation, 1969. 1(7).

UTTERBACK, J.M., "The process of innovation in instrument firm". 1969.

UTTERBACK, J.M., "The Process of TYechnological Innovation within the firm". 1971.

UTTERBACK, J.M., "The process of Innovation: A study of the Origination and Development of ideas for New Scientific Instruments". IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management", 1971. EM-18(4).

KLINE, S.J., "Innovation is not a linear process". Research Management, 1985.

FERNÁNDEZ SÁNCHEZ, E., "Innovación, Tecnología y Alianzas Estratégicas". 1996, Madrid: Editorial Civitas.

NONAKA, I. AND H. TAKEUCHI, "The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation". 1995: Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2012-01-09

How to Cite

Álvarez, E., Sánchez, L. E., & Molins, S. (2012). New technological surveillance and benchmarking theories and tools applied to sustainable and strategic planning of the naval industry. Ciencia Y tecnología De Buques, 5(10), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.25043/19098642.61

Issue

Section

Scientific and Technological Research Articles
QR Code